Aevolution they keep getting better DUHHere's a interesting fact of evolution in Hollywood.In 1982 TRON was made by a computer company of Disney. However disney directly refused to be part of the movie because they felt hand drawing was the only way to make movies.20 years later the hand drawn department was closed to do CGI instead.So, in a nutshell there's your answer.Oh and as for your question,Would you rather see something that looks fake or something CGI.

AOkay, I'm no expert on copywrite laws, but I know a little bit about media and the advertising world.1) Advertising is a business, so any likenesses of existing celebrities probably are cleared by their legal department to ensure that they don't get sued. If they didn't, and the similarity is obvious, they could get sued, because people who do voice overs using fake celebrity voices have been sued. I'm not certain who won in these cases, however, but being sued in general is bad enough. If it is the celebrity doing their animated character's voiceover, they probably got paid the going rate for a celebrity voiceover.2) Advertisers are always looking for ways to attract the audiences attention in the first place. If the virtual character made you tune into the message, then they have a better chance you will actually listen to their pitch buy the product than if you had ignored it originally.3) No, animated characters are not robots, they arecomputer generated 3-D renderings.4) I like virtual people in general. I like new things.5) I do not base my buying decisions on if I like the commercial or not, but rather if the product or service fills my need. I will favor a product or service I've heard of if the price is close, or if I percieve it to have added value over its competitor, because the fact of advertising indicates they are legitimate (may or may not be true, but that's the psychology)6) Certain people will always work, because for them that is fun. Tycoons always want more money, even after being comfortable for life. Life without challenges becomes boring. I would gladly have an automated "clone" if I had creative and financial control over its product, and reaped the rewards. My intuition is however, that managing the clone would be nearly as much work as doing all the work myself.

AMr. THe Was like and ex wrestler or something from wwf. Heres the two video promos from him.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLlCfC0bu6Qhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8LIWyJL_Mw

AI would rather lie at the threshold of the house of god,then dwell in the tents of the wicked.

AYou cannot patent an image.An image is copyrighted the moment it is created. However, you have to defend the image against copiers or you eventually will lose your rights to your copyright. Considering how the internet works, how would you ever keep people from copying your avatar? Also, it is relatively easy to create a new avatar that is sufficiently different from your avatar that no one is interested in yours.You could potentially trademark an avatar, but trademarks are for things used in interstate commerce. You would need to prove that your avatar is used for such a purpose.You may find more information about patents and trademarks at the patent office web site.

Ai doubt that will ever happen

AWell, in tails and what hair I have left all slicked back, I can do a pretty good Fred Astaire, so....Ginger, let's boogie. Put on the Fox Trots and the Beguines...the floor awaits.

AMight be "Virtuosity" starring Denzel Washington and Russel Crowe.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtuosity

AI'm guessin you mean the guy with his back turned to the camera that looks back over his shoulder and says "What's in your wallet". He looks like an child actor that has been in some movies. I'm having a hard time placing him too, but he has like no chin.

Aerrr....what language is it in, would be a great start!Also, if you have to write this program as a homework assignment and you have left it to the last minute, then good luck :D