AStart by finding a venture-capitalist to fund your start-up. Between $10,000,000.00 to $15,000,000.00 USD should be enough to get you through the first year.Good luck.

AI'm pretty sure it is Ivory Soap (Proctor and Gamble) the slogan is 99 44/100 percent pure

AListing yourself as a "co-founder" in this instance is inaccurate, and could get you into trouble during the hiring process. To express the sense of being the first person in the role, you might consider listing yourself as the "originator of the position," if anything.It might work better to simply show that you were the first in the position, though, rather than coming up with a bullet-point way to say it -- "show, don't tell," to use the old writing adage. Make it clear in your job responsibilities that you had to develop techniques or methods, and if you want to emphasize the fact that you were there during the founding of the company, you can do so more clearly in your cover letter, using plain and precise language.Good luck with the job search!

AYou are both called co-founders. Founder signifies that there is only one person that started the business. It is not a hierarchical type of word.

AIt depends on what it is that you founded or co-founded. Some things take more than one person to start. In other cases, people may wonder how much of the work you actually did.

ABill Gates and Paul AllenYou can read about it here.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsofthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_AllenHope this helpsGumby

AFarm House Cereal and Waheeda Rehman [Bollywood actress]?

A1. He will no longer be his own boss, he will now be answerable to shareholders. Depending on how many shares he still holds, he could be removed.2. He will be taxed on the shares he sells into the offering.3. The business affairs of the principals of the firm will be made public, what they are paid, whether they have had loans from the company etc.4. A person thinking of taking a company public would certainly be paying for professional advice rather than asking in here.

AHonest answer is a complete idiot, for obvious reasons and probably has an F in biology. She probably thinks that birds who lose their feathers are gonna regrow them within 10 minutes. Or when seals go extinct, the polar bears are gonna eat something other than what they've been eating for hundreds of years and some how gain new abilities and evolve within minutes to hunt them...>.>Gosh I've never read so much idiot(Made no sense, I know) in one statement before. Anyway, if there were extinctions then this causes entire ecological collapse, including US. Then there's an entirely new food chain that comes up. Though my point is, I rather keep us in the picture and see just what are limitations are.